Back
AMIT SHARMA
Ritu Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of marriage and initial complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability of petition. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's reliance on case law for inherent powers. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments against framing of charges. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's rulings on evidence and legal standards. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Sharma J. The present petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeks setting aside of the impugned order dated 10.05.2013, passed by Sh. Vinay Kumar Khanna, learned Additional Sessions Judge-04, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 09 of 2013, titled Ritu Sethi Vs. State & Ors., dismissing the said revision petition. Vide the said revision petition, the petitioner had sought setting aside of order on charge, dated 10.03.2013, passed by the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi; in case FIR No.36/2003 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station: Greater Kailash-I, whereby the husband/respondent no. 3 was charged under Section 498-A IPC, whereas other accused persons namely Mrs. Suniti Se
A second revision petition is not maintainable under Section 397(3) of the Cr.P.C.; mere allegations without sufficient evidence do not justify charges under IPC Sections 406 and 498A.
A second revision petition is not maintainable under Section 397(3) of the Cr.P.C. The scope of challenge under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is limited to cases where the orders are illegal or unsustai....
In appeals against acquittal, courts must respect the presumption of innocence and should only interfere if the trial's conclusions are shown to be perverse or based on erroneous appreciation of evid....
The withdrawal of a complaint amounts to acquittal of the accused, and a second complaint on the same facts and cause of action is not maintainable. The revisional court's power is limited to procedu....
Charges framed under Sections 498A and 323 IPC quashed due to lack of specific allegations and evidence, preventing abuse of process of law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the material on record and ascertaining if the essential ingredients of an offence are prima facie made out at the st....
Petitioner acquitted of charges under Section 498A IPC due to insufficient evidence of cruelty, demonstrating the High Court's role in correcting procedural misjudgments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
