AMAN CHAUDHARY
Kamal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sumer Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Aman Chaudhary, J. - Challenge in the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to the order dated 26.5.2017 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rewari allowing the revision petition filed against the order dated 16.11.2016 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kosli in complaint case No.144 dated 26.7.2012 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, whereby the present petitioners were discharged.
Factual aspect:
2. It is a case where a complaint has been filed by the respondent/complainant-Sumer Singh against the present petitioners, namely, Kamal Singh and Satpal Singh and one accused, namely, Smt. Mamta Yadav, for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC on 26.07.2012. The present petitioners were summoned vide order dated 14.07.2015 by the Ld. Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kosli for offence punishable under Section 120-B IPC whereas accused Mamta Yadav was summoned for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. Thereafter, the pre-charge evidence was led and charges came to be framed on 16.11.2016, thereby discharging the petitioners and framing charges against Mamta Yadav for offence punishable un
Bindeshwari Prasad Singh alias B.P. Singh and others vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and another
Duli Chand vs. Delhi Administration
Kerala vs. Puttumana Illath Jathavedan Namboodiri
State of Maharashtra vs. Sanjay Mangesh Poyarekar 2008 (4) RCR(Cri) 555
Supinder Singh vs. Provident Fund Inspector" 1997 (4) RCR(Cri) 449
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.