Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Gurbachan Kaur Sehgal (Dead) Through Lr. – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Sharma – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
CM APPLs. 13880 & 13882/2024 (for condonation of delay)
1.The present applications have been filed seeking condonation of a delay of 572 days in filing and 36 days in re-filing the appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the delay occurred due to unavoidable reasons.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent has fairly submitted that the delay may be condoned, subject to costs. Let a cost of Rs. 10,000/- be imposed on the appellant.
4. The delay in filing and re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the payment of Rs. 10,000/- to the respondent.
5. The applications stand disposed of.
CM APPL. 13881/2024 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
6. The application stands disposed of.
7. The present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 01.05.2021 in RCA No. 58/2018, titled Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Gurbachan Kaur Sehgal. The learned First Appellate Court allowed the appeal a
The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal subject to costs, emphasizing the need to consider the rent agreement in light of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
The concept of 'sufficient cause' for condoning delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction to advance substantial justice, and the length of delay is not a deci....
The court emphasized strict adherence to the Limitation Act, dismissing the appeal due to insufficient cause for delay in filing.
The court emphasized the term 'sufficient cause' as a necessary condition for the extension of the prescribed period under the Limitation Act, highlighting the importance of providing adequate reason....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article