S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
S. Rajamanickam – Appellant
Versus
Parvathiammal (Died) – Respondent
ORDER :
CMP No.17880 of 2021 is filed under Order 41, Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay 356 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Coimbatore in OS No.823 of 2004.
2. AS SR No.73050 of 2006 is filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41, Rule 1 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Coimbatore in OS No.823 of 2004.
3. The Trial Court passed the judgment and decree in OS No.823 of 2004 on 12.04.2005 and the Appeal Suit was instituted with a delay of 356 days. There was a consistent delay in pursuing the Appeal Suit filed by the appellant before the High Court Registry. The delay occurred at the stage when the case papers were returned by the High Court Registry and there was a delay of 2231 days in re-presenting the case papers by the appellant.
4. Again the case papers were returned by the High Court Registry on the ground that there was a deficit of Court Fee and even for complying with the said defect, the appellant took further delay of 2245 days in paying the deficit Cou
M.K. Prasad Versus P. Arumugam
Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Sahu & Others Versus Gobardhan Sap & Others
Ajit Singh Thakur Singh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat
C. Subraniam Versus Tamil Nadu Housing Board rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director
Kandaswamy and four others vs. Krishnamandiram Trust, Karur, by its Trustees and 33 others
Postmaster General and others vs. Living Media India Limited and another
Ramlal and others vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
N. Balakrishnan Versus M. Krishnamurthy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.