IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
Subata Khan – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
W.P.(C) 15681 of 2024
Decided on : 12-11-2024
(A) Cabinet Decision No. 2835 dated 13th May, 2020 - Ex-gratia compensation for COVID-19 related duties - The Petitioner sought compensation for the death of her mother, an Anganwadi worker, who succumbed to COVID-19 while performing essential services. The Court found that the deceased's duties did not qualify as COVID-19 specific duties as defined in the Cabinet Decision. (Paras 6, 10, 12)
(B) Essential Services vs. COVID-19 Duties - The Court distinguished between essential services and COVID-specific duties, ruling that while the deceased's work was essential, it did not meet the criteria for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision. (Paras 10, 11)
Facts of the case:
The Petitioner claimed ex-gratia compensation after her mother, an Anganwadi worker, died from COVID-19 while performing her duties during the pandemic. The GoM denied the claim, stating her duties were routine and not COVID-specific.
Findings of Court:
The GoM's decision was upheld as it adhered to the Cabinet Decision's criteria, distinguishing between essential services and COVID-specific duties.
Issues: The main issue was whether the deceased's duties qualified for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the deceased's role, while essential, did not entail the heightened risk associated with COVID-19 duties as defined by the Cabinet Decision, thus the denial of compensation was justified.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
1. The Petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents for grant of ex-gratia compensation of INR 1 Crore, as per Cabinet Decision No. 2835 dated 13th May, 2020. This claim arises from the untimely demise of her mother Late Mrs. Seema Khan, an Anganwadi worker who succumbed to COVID-19 on 17th April, 2021, when the pandemic was at its peak. The Petitioner contends that her mother work of distributing ration and participating in immunisation camps which qualified as essential services and falls within the ambit of COVID-19 related duties as provided in the Cabinet Decision. The Respondents have although rejected this claim, stating that Mrs. Khan’s though essential did not meet the criteria as defined in the policy. Aggrieved by this decision, the Petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The facts leading up to the filing of the present petition are as follows:
2. The Petitioner’s mother – Late Mrs. Seema Khan was appointed as the Anganwadi worker in 1982. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March, 2021, she carried out her duties of distribution of ‘Supplementary Nutritional Food’[“SNF”] as an Anganwadi worker under Anganwadi Centre[“AWC”] No. 95 in Delhi.
2.1 On 25th March, 2021, also undertook door to door distribution of ‘Take Home Ration’, in accordance with relevant guidelines. Thereafter, under the aegis of the Child & Development Project i.e. Integrated Child Development Services[“ICDS”], Project Jama Masjid organised an immunization camp for children in AWC from 27th to 29th March 2021, wherein Late Mrs. Seema provided her services on 27th March, 2021, in collaboration with Auxiliary Nurse Midwives[“ANMs”].
2.2 The Petitioner states that her mother actively participated in both the immunization camp and the distribution of essential supplies, fulfilling her role as an Anganwadi worker during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. Unfortunately, Late Mrs. Seema contracted COVID-19 infection and tested positive for the COVID-19 RTPCR test on 6th April, 2021. Despite being admitted to the emergency ward at Lok Nayak Hospital on 7th April, 2021, Mrs. Seema Khan succumbed to the infection on 17th April, 2021 and the primary cause of her death was held to be the COVID-19 infection.
2.3 In light of the above, the Petitioner asserts that as a legal heir of her mother, she is entitled to receive the ex-gratia compensation awarded to the family members of employees as per Cabinet Decision No. 2835 of GNCTD dated 13th May, 2020, which reads as follows:
| “GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (CO-ORDINATION BRANCH) DELHI SECRETARIAT, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI | |
| No. F.03/07/2020/GAD/CN/dsgadiii/458-469 | Dated: 13.05.2020 |
| TABLED ITEM CABINET DECISION NO. 2835 DATED 13.05.2020 Subject: Cabinet Note regarding awarding compensation to family of employees who die of the disease while on COVID 19 duty. Decision: The Council of Ministers considered the note of Minister (H&FW) and approved that any person including Doctor, Nurse, Paramedical Staff, Security/Sanitation staff or any other Govt. Officers/Official, including Police Officer/Official, whether temporary or permanent employees or contractual, in Government of Private Sector, deployed for COVID-19 duties by Government of NCT of Delhi, if expires by contracting the disease during discharge of his/her duty, his/her family shall be paid an ex-gratia amount of Rupees One Crore, posthumously. The concerned Department/Agency, where the person was employed, will submit the case with their recommendations, enclosing the report of Death Audit Committee and report of Medical Superintendent/In-charge of the Hospital/ Medical Institution to Revenue Department, GNCTD for further processing for payment of the ex-gratia and same shall be put up to Minister (Health), through Minister (Revenue), for the approv | |
The court ruled that essential services performed by an Anganwadi worker during the pandemic did not qualify for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision for COVID-19 specific duties.
Clarity on the deployment for COVID-19 duty and adherence to the criteria for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision are essential for granting compensation.
Government policies providing ex-gratia compensation to frontline workers during a pandemic must be interpreted liberally. Distinguishing between routine and emergency duties to deny benefits is arbi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to receive the ex gratia amount of Rs. 70 Lakhs under Regulation 29-A (2) of JdVVNL Pension Regulations, 1988 and....
The court ruled that the absence of an RTPCR test certificate does not preclude compensation claims for frontline workers who died from Covid-19 while performing their duties.
The court ruled that formal documentation is not strictly necessary for ex gratia compensation if the employee's duties inherently involved exposure to Covid-19, especially during the pandemic.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.