SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Esam Ahmad Bilgrami – Appellant
Versus
Aaliyah Saeed Dang – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Varchaswa Singh
For the Respondent: Nidhi Mehrotra

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assails the correctness of Order dated 17.08.2023 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned Family Court [hereinafter referred to as the “Family Court”] whereby the Family Court allowed an interim application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”], filed by the Respondent-mother, granting her permission to relocate the minor child, Master Emad Ahmad Bilgrami, to Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE) with her, subject to certain undertakings and safeguards.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The brief facts leading to the present Appeal, as pleaded, are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 30.06.2009 in Hyderabad, Telangana as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, a male child was born on 25.06.2013. Owing to the m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top