US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Esam Ahmad Bilgrami – Appellant
Versus
Aaliyah Saeed Dang – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
1. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assails the correctness of Order dated 17.08.2023 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned Family Court [hereinafter referred to as the “Family Court”] whereby the Family Court allowed an interim application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”], filed by the Respondent-mother, granting her permission to relocate the minor child, Master Emad Ahmad Bilgrami, to Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE) with her, subject to certain undertakings and safeguards.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The brief facts leading to the present Appeal, as pleaded, are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 30.06.2009 in Hyderabad, Telangana as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. Out of the said wedlock, a male child was born on 25.06.2013. Owing to the m
The paramount consideration in custody disputes is the welfare of the child, allowing interim relocation based on the custodial parent's employment opportunities while ensuring access for the non-cus....
The paramount consideration in custody matters is the welfare of the child. The preference of the child to be with one of the parents should be the primary factor, as long as there is no disability p....
Welfare of the child is paramount in custody disputes; natural guardianship does not guarantee custody without proven benefits for the child's well-being.
The paramount consideration in child custody cases is the welfare of the child, taking into account the child's ordinary comfort, health, education, and favorable surroundings, as well as the human t....
Anuradha Sharma vs. Anuj Sharma
-
Read summaryAakriti Kapoor vs. Abhinav Agarwal
-
Read summaryRosy Jacob vs. Jacob A. Chakramakkal
-
Read summaryRitika Sharan v. Sujoy Ghosh
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.