IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, Renu Bhatnagar
Ashwin Murli – Appellant
Versus
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding disability rights and employment (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 3. court's analysis on reasonable accommodation and disability (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 4. court's key decision on appointment and employment rights (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 5. conclusion and directive for the respondent (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT :
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
1. This appeal has been filed, challenging the Order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 13279/2023, titled Ashwin Murli vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Ors., dismissing the petition filed by the appellant herein and holding as under:
“34. In light of the foregoing discussions, this Court dismisses the instant petition on the ground that the letter dated 6th December 2022 wherein the petitioner was denied employment being medically unfit is not violative of rights, since the respondent no.1 has acted in compliance with its statutory rules. Fur
Vikash Kumar vs. Union Public Service Commission and Ors.
Avni Prakash vs. National Testing Agency (NTA) & Others
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Union of India and Ors. vs. Dalbir Singh and Anr.
Tajvir Singh Sodhi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Tajvir Singh Sodhi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Re: Recruitment of Visually Impaired in Judicial Services
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Krishna Rai (Dead) Through legal representatives and Ors. vs. Banaras Hindu University and Ors.
The principle of reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act mandates that all individuals with disabilities are entitled to employment opportunities without rigid adhe....
Reasonable accommodation under RPwD Act is mandatory prerequisite for assessing recruitment eligibility of persons with benchmark disabilities, requiring consideration of alternative qualification eq....
The court ruled that visually impaired candidates are eligible for judicial service, striking down discriminatory rules and emphasizing the need for reasonable accommodation and separate cut-off mark....
Reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right ensuring equality for persons with disabilities; technicalities should not obstruct justice for discrimination cases.
The court ruled that candidates with disabilities must not be discriminated against based on their degree of disability, ensuring equal treatment in public employment.
The principle of reasonable accommodation requires that individuals with disabilities receive necessary support to ensure their equal participation in employment processes, regardless of procedural l....
Valid benchmark disability certificate with validity period entitles reservation under RPwD Act in direct recruitment, regardless of 'temporary' label; executive instructions cannot override statute ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.