IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, Renu Bhatnagar
Ashwin Murli – Appellant
Versus
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
1. This appeal has been filed, challenging the Order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 13279/2023, titled Ashwin Murli vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Ors., dismissing the petition filed by the appellant herein and holding as under:
“34. In light of the foregoing discussions, this Court dismisses the instant petition on the ground that the letter dated 6th December 2022 wherein the petitioner was denied employment being medically unfit is not violative of rights, since the respondent no.1 has acted in compliance with its statutory rules. Furthermore, this Court by way of issuing writ of mandamus cannot direct the respondent no.1 to issue guidelines/rules for employment of the candidates with hearing loss of less than 40%, since such power vests with the executive/ legislature, since the same would amount to transgressing the power of this Court under its writ jurisdiction.”
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. To give a brief background of facts in which the present appeal arises, the appellant appeared in the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering (GATE) Instrumentation Engineering Paper, 2020, a nationwide competitive examination used
Vikash Kumar vs. Union Public Service Commission and Ors.
Avni Prakash vs. National Testing Agency (NTA) & Others
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Union of India and Ors. vs. Dalbir Singh and Anr.
Tajvir Singh Sodhi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Tajvir Singh Sodhi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Re: Recruitment of Visually Impaired in Judicial Services
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Krishna Rai (Dead) Through legal representatives and Ors. vs. Banaras Hindu University and Ors.
The principle of reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act mandates that all individuals with disabilities are entitled to employment opportunities without rigid adhe....
The court ruled that visually impaired candidates are eligible for judicial service, striking down discriminatory rules and emphasizing the need for reasonable accommodation and separate cut-off mark....
The principle of reasonable accommodation and the positive obligation of the State to provide additional support to persons with disabilities to facilitate their full and effective participation in s....
Reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right ensuring equality for persons with disabilities; technicalities should not obstruct justice for discrimination cases.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of government establishments to provide reasonable accommodation and non-discriminatory treatment to employees with disabilities,....
The court ruled that candidates with disabilities must not be discriminated against based on their degree of disability, ensuring equal treatment in public employment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.