J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
In Re: Recruitment Of Visually Impaired In Judicial Services – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Leave granted. This judgment is organized under the following heads for easy reference and understanding:
| SL.NO. | HEADS | |
| I | INTRODUCTION | |
| II | RELIEFS PRAYED FOR | |
| III | SUMMARY OF PLEADINGS & SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSELS | |
| A | SUO MOTU W.P. (CIVIL) NO.2 OF 2024 [IN RE: RECRUITMENT OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED IN JUDICIAL SERVICES VS. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS] | |
| A.1 | SUBMISSIONS OF DR. SANJAY JAIN – INTERVENOR | |
| B | SUO MOTU W.P. (CIVIL) NO.6 OF 2024 [IN RE: RECRUITMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES’ CANDIDATES IN RAJASTHAN JUDICIAL SERVICES VS. HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS] | |
| C | AYUSH YARDI VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ANOTHER [SLP(C) NO.12179 OF 2024] | |
| D | ALOK SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [SLP(C) NO.7683 OF 2024] | |
| E | MANVENDRA SINGH RATHORE & ORS. ALISHA KHAN VS. HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. [W.P.(C) NOS.484 AND 494 OF 2024] | |
| IV | ISSUES THAT ARISE FOR CONSIDERATION | |
| V | DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | |
| A | EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK & NEED FOR ELEVATING RIGHT AGAINST DISABILITY - BASED DISCRIMINATION TO A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT | |
| B | NTERNATIONAL | |
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India
Vikash Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission and others
Jeeja Ghosh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Union of India v. National Federalism of the Blind, (2013) 10 SCC 772 [Para 23.1
Dr.Kavita Khamboj v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana and others
Abhimeet Sinha and Others v. High Court of Judicature at Patna and others
Col. Nitisha v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Taniya Malik v. High Court of Delhi
Anamol Bhandari v. Delhi Technological University
Aryan Raj v. State (UT) of Chandigarh
Haridas Parsedia v. Urmila Shakya
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 Supp3 SCC 217 [Paras 58
The court ruled that visually impaired candidates are eligible for judicial service, striking down discriminatory rules and emphasizing the need for reasonable accommodation and separate cut-off mark....
The principle of reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act mandates that all individuals with disabilities are entitled to employment opportunities without rigid adhe....
The judgment emphasizes the statutory provisions and government orders governing age relaxation, grace marks, and reservation for PwDs, and directs the respondents to work out backlog vacancies and p....
Appointment on posts of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate under Civil Judge Cadre – Candidates who consciously took part in process of selection cannot be permitted to question advertisement or met....
The imposition of a maximum disability limit for public employment violates the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, establishing that suitability must be assessed through reasonable accommodatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.