IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Asif Hamid Khan S/o Mr. Hamidullah Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. societal challenges in addressing sexual harassment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. processes and complaints regarding workplace harassment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. progression of investigation and initial findings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's authority to summon based on provided evidences. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. impact of inquiry report on criminal proceedings. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 6. credibility of complainant's statements in harassment context. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. perspective on inappropriate conduct from victim's pov. (Para 57 , 60 , 61) |
| 8. sufficiency of evidence for prima facie case. (Para 72 , 74) |
JUDGMENT :
“First my Fear; then my courtesy;
My fear is your displeasure,
My speech to beg your pardon.”
1. This aptly sums up the life of a woman; be it home or office.
3. Petitioner, Asif Hamid Khan has approach this Court under Article 226 /227 Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “ Cr.P.C .”) for setting aside of the Order dated 04.09.2018 passed by the Ld. ASJ, New Delhi who has upheld the summoning Order dated 21.08.2017 passed by the Ld. CMM, New Delhi, in FIR No. 16/2015 dated 10.02.2015 under Section 35
Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. v. Girish V.
Keshav v. State of Maharashtra
Bhagwat Singh vs. Commissioner of Police
Judicial review of summoning orders in sexual harassment cases allows for independent assessment of evidence, affirming that initial exoneration by inquiry committees does not preclude criminal prose....
The burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is different from that in a departmental proceeding. The court must treat complainants of sexual harassment and assault sensitively and ensure a fair tria....
Vague allegations of harassment do not constitute a prima facie case for prosecution under IPC Sections 354-A and 354-D, especially when supported by exonerating enquiry findings.
Summoning of an accused under IPC Section 354 requires clear evidence; unexplained delays and lack of corroborating witnesses render allegations insufficient.
The court quashed the FIR against the petitioner, finding no evidence of sexual harassment or conspiracy, emphasizing the lack of mens rea and the frivolous nature of the allegations.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles, ruling that the petitioner must be given a fair opportunity to defend himself in the ICC proceedings.
The Nagaland State Commission for Women has the authority to investigate workplace harassment complaints and file reports, enabling criminal actions under relevant laws when evidence suggests. Both c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that non-observance of the principle of natural justice, procedural irregularities, and findings based on irrelevant material can vitiate departmen....
The court emphasized the importance of an independent departmental inquiry and the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.