Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Mamta Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's complaint and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussion of procedural and evidentiary concerns (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's evaluation and relevant legal standards (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. final determination regarding summoning the accused (Para 21) |
| 5. petition dismissal and legal finality (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.) for setting aside the impugned orders dated 07.06.2010 and 15.09.2010, whereby vide order dated 07.06.2010, the complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C for summoning, trying and prosecuting the accused for the offence under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code ("IPC") was dismissed by the learned ACMM in Criminal Complaint No. 805/1, and thereafter, vide order dated 15.09.2010, the revision petition filed against the dismissal of the complaint was also dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini in Criminal Revision Petition No. 26 of 2010.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was working as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) with Aryabhat P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
