SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 415

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
Tushar Gupta - Petitioner
Vs.
Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 9673 Of 2025
Decided On : 29-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Counsel (Appearance not given).
For the Respondent:Ms. Latika Choudhury, Advocate with Mr. B.S. Rawat, CI DTTE for R-1. Mr. Akash Srivastava, Advocate

Systemic irregularities found in the recruitment process justify its cancellation, outweighing individual candidate rights.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Process - Constitution of India, Article 14 - The cancellation of recruitment on administrative grounds due to systemic irregularities is justifiable, maintaining integrity and fairness in the process. The University had the right to cancel the process due to misconduct found in previous administrations. (Paras 9, 10, 16)

(B) Legitimate Expectation - Such expectations from candidates must be balanced with public interest; the exercise of discretion by authorities should ensure fairness and non-arbitrariness in public recruitment processes. (Paras 25, 26)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for a Technical Assistant position under an advertisement from 2022, but the recruitment process was cancelled in 2025 due to alleged irregularities during the tenure of the previous Vice Chancellor.

Findings of Court:
The reasons cited by the University regarding the systemic issues warranted cancellation of the recruitment process. The lack of specific qualifications and administrative irregularities justified the decision.

Issues: The key issues involved the permissibility of cancelling an entire recruitment process due to systemic irregularities, and whether the applicant had any vested rights to enforce the continuation of the process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that systematic irregularities justified cancellation of the recruitment, emphasizing that candidates have no legal right to insist on completion of processes if significant malpractice is demonstrated.

Result: The petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's application and recruitment overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. cancellation of recruitment due to administrative reasons. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT : 

PRATEEK JALAN, J.

1. The petitioner applied for the post of Technical Assistant in respondent No. 2 – Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University [“the University”], pursuant to an advertisement issued on 29.10.2022. He is aggrieved by a notification dated 02.06.2025, by which the entire recruitment process has been cancelled “due to administrative reasons”.

2. The advertisement in question included a total of 45 vacancies across 11 non-teaching posts under the University, including 5 posts at the level of Technical Assistant. The detailed recruitment advertisement provided the essential qualifications for each post, including the post of Technical Assistant. The vacancies for the post of Technical Assistant comprised four posts in the School of Allied Health Sciences [“SAHS”] and one post in the School of Physiotherapy [“SoP”]. The qualifications provided for the post were as follows:

“Educational Qualification:

Essential:

B.Sc. in Science (PCM/PCB)/Bachelor degree in Pharmacy/Allied Health Sciences from a recognized University/Board or equivalent with 04 years Industrial/Lab Experience in desired trade.

or

Two years State Board Diploma or equivalent in the relevant Pharmacy/Allied Health Sciences subject/field with 05 years of Industrial/Laboratory Experience in the relevant trade.”

3. In the advertisement, the University provided inter alia the following general instructions:

“2. The vacancies advertised are provisional and liable to vary (increase or decrease). In case the vacancy position is reduced to any number or even zero due to any circumstances, University will not be liable to compensate the applicant for any consequential damage/loss.

3. The University reserves the right to cancel or modify the advertisement or part of it at any stage. The number of vacancies is provisional and subject to change.

4. The University reserves the right to cancel a part or entire process of examination or a part of it due to administrative reasons and in case of unfair means, cheating or other irregularities/ malpractice noticed by the University. The University also reserves the right to cancel or set up a new examination Centre and divert the candidates to appear at that examination Centre if required.”[Emphasis supplied.]

4. The petitioner applied for the post of Technical Assistant, and appeared in an online test on 04.02.2023. The selection was to be made through a computer-based examination followed by a skill test/laboratory test. He was thereafter called for the skill test and was asked to submit documents.

5. By the impugned communication dated 02.06.2025, the recruitment process, for all the posts in question, has been cancelled. The notification does not contain any detailed reason, but only refers to “administrative reasons”.

6. In order to examine the reasons for which the recruitment was cancelled, the Court called for a counter affidavit to be filed by the University.

7. The counter affidavit dated 14.08.2025, filed by the University, discloses the following reasons for cancellation:

“7. That it is submitted that there have been infirmities in the recruitment process in the university during the tenure of the Ex-Vice Chancellor and in view of that Department of technical education and vigilance department, GNCTD has raised doubt about the recruitment of faculties in the university by the then Vice Chancellor and the advertisement for the various post of non-teaching staff i.e. group B and C was made during the tenure of the Ex- Vice Chancellor. 8. That it is submitted that the Deputy Director (Vigilance), Directorate of Training and Technical Education (DTTE), GNCT of Delhi, vide letter No.F.3(1272)/DTTE/Vig./2020/Shadow file/213-220 dated 17.02.2024, addressed to the then Vice Chancellor of DPSRU (who was also holding additional charge of DPSRU in addition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top