Pravesh Kumar vs State Of Nct Of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Del) 451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AJAY DIGPAUL
Pravesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nct Of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, Appellant for State and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. along with SI Ravi Poonia, PS Dayalpur.

Table of Content
1. factual background of alleged property fraud. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT :

AJAY DIGPAUL, J.

1. The Petitioner, through the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (formerly Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeks regular bail in FIR No. 391/2023 underSections 420 , 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code , 1860, registered at P.S. Dayalpur, Delhi.

Factual Background

2. The case arises out of FIR No. 391/2023 dated 27.05.2023, based on a written complaint filed by one Mohd. Hamid. The allegations pertain to a property fraud involving House No. D-7/63, Dayalpur, Delhi, [hereinafter “subject property”], measuring 200 square yards, which the complainantclaims to have purchased from the present petitioner, Pravesh Kumar, on the basis of forged and fabricated documents.

3. The complainant states that the transaction was initiated on 27.10.2022, when a meeting took place at the residence of the petitioner. In the presence of several persons, including the petitioner’s father Chhote Lal, wife Suman Lata, daughter, and others, a token amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- was paid by the complainant. Subsequent cash pa