SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 540

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, SHAIL JAIN, JJ.
 
M/S ECG Easy Connect Logistics Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Customs - Respondent
CUSAA 35/2024 & CM APPL. 22961/2024
Decided on : 18-08-2025
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen, Ms. Oshin Maggu, Ms. Maninder Kaur & Mr. Aryan Nagpal, Advs. (9650046568)
For the Respondent: Mr. Vijay Joshi, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Shubham Chaturvedi, Adv.

The doctrine of proportionality applies in administrative actions, requiring penalties to be commensurate with violations identified.

Headnote:(A) Customs Act, 1962 - Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration And Processing) Regulations, 2010 - Revocation of courier registration and imposition of penalty - Appellant acted as a courier agency for imports, but was found complicit in misdeclarations - The CESTAT dismissed the appeal against penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962 and for violating regulations - Court invoked the doctrine of proportionality for revocation of registration, ruling it as disproportionate to the violation committed. (Paras 12, 26)

(B) Doctrine of Proportionality - The action taken by authorities should be commensurate with the breach; mere lapses do not necessitate severe action unless grave violations are established. (Paras 23, 24)

Facts of the case:
The Appellant was accused of misdeclaration in customs clearance operations, leading to a Show Cause Notice and subsequent penalties; however, an inquiry previously cleared them of wrongdoing, which was contested in later proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the penalties but modified the revocation of the courier registration, emphasizing a balanced approach aligned with the doctrine of proportionality.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the misdeclaration of goods and the appropriate level of penalties and actions to be taken against the Appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the severity of revocation must align with the gravity of violations, highlighting deficiencies in the authority's prior assessment of proportionality.

Result: The revocation was reduced and modified; penalty was upheld.

Table of Content
1. background of appellant's customs clearance operations and allegations of misdeclaration. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
2. details on order-in-original dismissing the initial penalties based on earlier inquiries. (Para 7 , 10 , 12)
3. appellant's arguments on previous exoneration versus subsequent findings of complicity. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. court's application of the doctrine of proportionality in administrative penalties. (Para 22 , 23 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present appeal has been filed by M/s ECG Easy Connect Logistics Pvt. Ltd., which is an authorised courier agent having a courier licence bearing No. DEL/POUCOUR/18/2018-19, issued by the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi, which is valid until 4th March 2031.

3. The business of the Appellant is in the nature of Customs clearance through courier mode and the Appellant is registered as an authorised courier agent since 2018.

4. The background giving rise to the present appeal is that the Appellant acted as a courier agency for imports by two entities namely M/s Kripa Shankar Maurya and M/s Mangalmurti Traders (hereinafter, ‘the importers’). All the documents including the bills of entry, invoices, etc., were submitted by the Appellant with the Customs Department for clearance of the imported goods.

5. The Customs Department, thereafter, alleged that there was misdeclaration by the Appellant in the said consignment of imported goods in terms of quantity, value, description and classification which led to a Show Cause Notice (hereinafter, ‘SCN’) being issued to the importers, as also to the Appellant, which was the courier agency involved in the import of the said consignments.

6. The said show cause notice-cum-suspension order was issued on 27th November 2020 and the Appellant’s operations were initially suspended with immediate effect i.e. from the same date itself. An inquiry was conducted and pursuant to a report dated 13th January 2021, the Appellant was found not guilty.

7. Thereafter, vide Order-in-Original dated 5th February 2021, the Commissioner of Customs (Airport and General) held that the Appellant had abided by all provisions of the Acts and the Rules, Regulations, Notifications and Orders thereof. The operative portion of the said Order-in-Original dated 5th February 2021 reads as under:

“ORDER

In exercise of powers conferred in terms of Regulation 13 read with Regulation 14 of CIER, 2010:

(i) I refrain from revoking the courier Registration No. DEL/POL/COUR/18/2018-19 (PAN No. AAFCE0636C) valid up to 04-03-2021, of M/s ECG Easy Connect Logistics (P) Ltd, as proposed in the Show Cause Notice cum Suspension Order No. 24/ MK/ Suspension/ Policy/ 2020 dated 27-11-2020.

(ii) I refrain from forfeiting the security submitted at the time of issuance of the courier Registration No. DEL/POL/COUR/ 18/2018-19 which was valid up to 04-03-2021 of M/s ECG Easy Connect Logistics (P) Ltd, as proposed in the Show Cause Notice cum Suspension Order No. 24/MK/Suspension/ Policy/2020 dated 27-11-2020.

(iii) I refrain from imposing any penalty upon M/s ECG Easy Connect Logistics (P) Ltd However, I caution them to be more careful in future in complying with provisions of CIER, 2010.”

8. Thereafter, proceedings were again initiated against the Appellant with respect to the same transactions under the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration And Processing) Regulations, 2010 (hereinafter, ‘CIER’) vide SCN dated 30th September, 2021 wherein the Appellant was called upon to show cause as to why penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 , should not be imposed on them. In respect of the said proceedings, supplementary SCN was issued to the Appellant on 22nd September, 2022.

9. Pursuant to the SCNs mentioned above, the Order-in-Original dated 17th July, 2023 came to be passed by which the Additional Commissioner of Customs refrained from imposing any penalty upon the Appellant.

10. Du

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top