IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ.
Court On Its Own Motion – Petitioner
Versus
Mahender Singh Manan & Ors. – Respondents
Crl. Rev. P. 248 of 2017
Decided On : 11-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and initiation of proceedings by the court. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
1. The present Criminal Revision Petition was instituted in the Suo Moto exercise of powers under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, [CrPC], pursuant to the Order dated 29.03.2017 passed by this Court. This Court, on prima facie assessment, found that the Judgment dated 04.08.1986 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi, [Ld. ASJ] in Sessions Case No. 33/86 titled as State vs. Mahender Singh Manan & Ors, was unsustainable. The Ld. ASJ, by the said judgement, acquitted the two accused persons in the case of the alleged killing of one Shri Avtar Singh, a Sikh, during the riots which ensued in Delhi in the year 1984, in the aftermath of the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India.
BRIEF FACTS:
2. The assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, in the year 1984, culminated in widespread riots in the entire city of Delhi. A devastating result of which, inter alia, was the death of several innocent Sikhs and the destruction of properties belonging to Sikh families and the Gurudwaras in the Raj Nagar Area.
3. The present Criminal Revision Petition arises out of the FIR No. 416/1984 dated 04.11.1984, registered at Police Station, Delhi Cantonment. The said FIR was registered at the instance of one Mrs. Baljit Kaur, [Complainant/Respondent No. 4], daughter of late Shri Avtar Singh. Late Shri Avtar Singh, was working as an Upper Division Clerk in the Accounts Office of the Air Force at Dhaula Kuan.
4. The Complainant, in her complaint, stated that, on 01.11.1984, around 3:30 PM, a mob consisting of approximately 400-500 people came to her residence and broke down and set fire to the house door. Thereafter, the mob proceeded to hit the parents of the Complainantwith bricks. She stated that the mob left only after her father lost consciousness, believing that her father had passed away. The mob continued to visit the Complainant‟s house approximately 5-6 times and assaulted the Complainant‟s parents. However, on the seventh visit, the mob spotted the father of the Complainant. It is stated that the father of the Complainant had become mona sardar, that is, his hair had been trimmed/shaved, and upon seeing the same, certain rioters left the instance, stating that “he had become a Hindu” and should be spared.
5. The Complainant alleged that one Mahender Singh Sharabi, who was their neighbour, identified her father and attacked him with an Axe (phersa). Pursuant to which, other rioters also attacked the father of the Complainant. The Complainant stated that as a result of the beating, her father's brain matter had come out of the skull; however, he was still breathing when the rioters poured petrol on him and set him on fire. The Complainant further stated that these persons had removed the handle of the hand-pump and taken it away with them, so that the fire could not be extinguished. As a result, the Complainant‟s father was completely burnt. Thereafter, the Complainant, with her brother, went to Subroto Park Air Force Camp to seek refuge.
6. An FIR No. 416/1984 was registered at the instance of the Complainant on 04.11.1984, which has led to Session Case No. 33/86, which gave rise to the present Criminal Revision Petition.
7. Several other complaints were received regarding the murders of innocent Sikhs and the destruction of properties in the Raj Nagar area after the registration of the said FIR. A composite challan had been filed inter alia in all the aforesaid complaints, ultimately giving rise to various Sessions Cases, including the said Session Case No. 33/86. It is pertinent to mention that all the Sessions Cases were tried separately, and the accused person in the present case was acquitted by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi, vide Judgment dated 04.10.1986 in Session Case No. 33/86, titled as S
The Court determined that the right to compensation under Section 357A of the CrPC is prospective and cannot be applied retroactively, thus affecting claims for incidents occurring before its enactme....
Victims of crimes are entitled to compensation under Section 357A of the Criminal Procedure Code, regardless of when the crime occurred, reflecting the duty of courts to ensure justice for victims.
The amended provisions of Section 357A of Cr.P.C. and the Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011 are applicable to incidents that occurred prior to their enactment, entitling victims to compensation and re....
The acquittal of an accused does not preclude a victim's right to compensation under the Odisha Victim Compensation Scheme if the victim meets eligibility criteria, as outlined in Section 357A of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.