RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, JITENDRA KUMAR
Sunil Kumar Jha @ Sunil Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Jitendra Kumar, J. – The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.11.2014 passed by 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in Sessions Trial No. 857 of 2009, arising out of Bhagalpur Rail P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009, whereby the sole Appellant has been found guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to pay the fine, additional imprisonment of 3 years. The fine amount has been directed to be paid to Harsh Kumar, the son of the deceased.
2. The prosecution case, as unfolded by the written report of the Informant Radha Kant Jha dated 22.04.2009 to the S.H.O. Rail Police Station, Bhagalpur at 15 O’ Clock, is that deceased Sanju Devi was married with the sole accused Sunil Jha, Son of Late Ratneshwar Jha, Resident of Village- Madhukar Chak, Police Station- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura in 1998 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. The next day of the marriage, the accused left the matrimonial home without giving any information to anybody. After three years, he was brought to home with social efforts of the family and his Gaun
Narender Kumar vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Mohd. Hussain vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
State of Rajasthan vs. Anil @ Hanif
Neeraj Dutta vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Rajendra Prabhu Chikane vs. State of Maharashtra
Premchand vs. State of Maharashtra
Rautu Bodra vs. State of Bihar
Ranvir Yadav vs. State of Bihar
Yogesh Singh vs. Mahabeer Singh
Pritinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
Ravi Sharma vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Shailendra Rajdev Pasvan vs. State of Gujarat
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Chintappa Patil vs. State of Maharashtra
Victims of crimes are entitled to compensation under Section 357A of the Criminal Procedure Code, regardless of when the crime occurred, reflecting the duty of courts to ensure justice for victims.
The amended provisions of Section 357A of Cr.P.C. and the Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011 are applicable to incidents that occurred prior to their enactment, entitling victims to compensation and re....
(1) Victim compensation – Payment of victim compensation cannot be a consideration or a ground for reducing sentence imposed upon accused as victim compensation is not a punitive measure and only res....
(1) Age determination is of paramount importance for ascertaining whether or not an accused comes within purview of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.(2) Compensation to vi....
The court confirmed that victims of acid attacks are entitled to significant compensation under the relevant victim compensation schemes, emphasizing the court's duty to act compassionately and in ac....
The acquittal of an accused does not preclude a victim's right to compensation under the Odisha Victim Compensation Scheme if the victim meets eligibility criteria, as outlined in Section 357A of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.