Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Inland World Logistics Pvt. Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lease agreement details and termination process (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. writ petitions filed post-termination (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arbitration claim for compensation (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. appellant's arguments against the award (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's analysis of the appeal and grounds (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. conclusion of appeal dismissal (Para 37) |
JUDGMENT :
SHALINDER KAUR, J
FAO (COMM) 48/2025 &CM APPL. 9244/2025
1. The present Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the A&C Act") read with Section 13 of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015 (for short, "the CCA") has been preferred against the Order dated 28.09.2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial-03), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (Trial Court) in O.M.P. (COMM) No.212/2019 titled ‘ Union of India v. Inland World Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ’, whereby the learned Trial Court has dismissed the petition filed by the Appellant herein under Section 34 of the A&C Act challenging the Arbitral Award dated 14.08.2018.
BRIEF FACTS
2. The Respondent before us is a lease holder with t
The scope of appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited, disallowing re-evaluation of evidence unless there is manifest illegality or denial of natural justice.
The court emphasized that judicial interference with arbitral awards is strictly limited, focusing only on issues of public policy or jurisdictional errors and cannot re-evaluate the merits of the aw....
The court emphasized the importance of considering relevant evidence and court orders in arbitration proceedings and held that a decision based on irrelevant or unproven evidence can be considered pe....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
The court reaffirmed that judicial intervention in arbitration under Sections 34 and 37 is limited to ensuring no substantial legal errors occurred, emphasizing the importance of respecting the arbit....
Judicial scrutiny under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited; courts must respect arbitral awards unless proven to violate public policy or statutory obligations, affirming the principle t....
Point of law: Arbitration Award - It must clearly be understood that when a court is applying the "public policy" test to an arbitration award, it does not act as a court of appeal and consequently e....
The limited scope of interference under Section 34 of the A&C Act of 1996 and the requirement for an arbitral award to be suffering from patent illegality for it to be set aside.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
