SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 790

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. NAJMUL ARAFEEN CHAWLA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
DR. MOHD NAJEEB – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.

1. By way of present revision petition filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter, ‘DRC Act’), the petitioners seek to set aside the order dated 05.09.2024 passed by learned ARC-02, Central, Tis hazari Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition No. RC/ARC No.436/2021 (hereinafter, ‘impugned judgment’) whereby their application seeking leave to defend came to be dismissed.

Notably, the respondent/landlord had filed the eviction petition under 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act in respect of property being Ward No. VI, municipal number 1149-50 (old. no.802A), Gali Chhatta Ibrahim, Haveli Hisamuddin Haider, Ballimaran, Delhi-110006 (hereinafter, referred to as ‘subject premises’).

2. Respondent claimed to be owner and landlord of subject premises. He claimed that the subject premises were purchased by his parents from Custodian of Evacuee Property Department by virtue of Conveyance Deed dated 24.11.1962, whereafter, the same was let out to the father of the petitioners for residential purposes.

3. The petitioners, in their application for leave to defend averred that there was no bona fide requirement on part of the respondent to seek eviction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top