SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S.C. BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. acquittal under negotiable instruments act. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. burden of proof on loan source. (Para 5 , 6)
3. rebuttal of presumption under section 139. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. defendant's counterclaims and evidence. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. principles of criminal appeal under ni act. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. rebutting liability presumption. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. court's directive and conclusion. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT :

CRL.L.P. 637/2019 & CRL.L.P. 638/2019

1. The present leaves to appeal are filed against the judgement dated 30.08.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned judgement’) passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’), Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Cases Nos. 521120/2016 and 632692/2016, whereby Respondent No. 2 was acquitted of the offence under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘NI Act’

2. For the reasons discussed below, leaves to appeal are granted.

CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered) and CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered)

3. The two complaints under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act were filed at the instance of the complainant/ appellant. It is averred that the accused/ Respondent No. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top