IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S.C. BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CRL.L.P. 637/2019 & CRL.L.P. 638/2019
1. The present leaves to appeal are filed against the judgement dated 30.08.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned judgement’) passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’), Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Cases Nos. 521120/2016 and 632692/2016, whereby Respondent No. 2 was acquitted of the offence under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘NI Act’
2. For the reasons discussed below, leaves to appeal are granted.
CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered) and CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered)
3. The two complaints under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act were filed at the instance of the complainant/ appellant. It is averred that the accused/ Respondent No. 2 is known to the appellant for many years as both have their factories in the same complex in Okhla, Delhi. It is alleged that the appellant advanced a friendly loan of Rs.5,00,000/- in cash to Respondent No. 2, in the month of April, 2015 after arranging the same from one of his friends namely– Malkait Singh. Thereafter another sum of Rs.4,00,000/- in cash was advanced to Respondent No. 2 by the appellant on another occasion, after arranging the same from the sa
G. Pankajakshi Amma v. Mathai Mathew
Raj Kumar Khurana v. State (NCT of Delhi)
M. Abbas Haji v. T.N. Channakeshava
Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel v. State of Gujarat
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.