SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAVI ZHINGA – Appellant
Versus
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of narcotics case. (Para 2)
2. applicant's arguments against bail grant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. factors considered for bail decisions. (Para 16 , 18)
4. legal standards for granting bail under ndps act. (Para 17 , 26 , 30)
5. court allows bail with conditions. (Para 34 , 36 , 38)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

1. The present bail application is filed seeking regular bail in Case No. VIII/24/DZU/23, registered for offences under Sections 8 (c), 20 (b), 22(c), 23(c), 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘NDPS Act’).

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :

2.1. On 29.05.2023, a secret information was received that one person, namely, Gajender Singh, will come for booking a parcel containing narcotic drugs at DTDC Courier. On the basis of the said information, accused Gajender was intercepted by the raiding team when he arrived at the DTDC Office. It is alleged that accused Gajender was carrying a light green envelop. A recovery of 15 LSD paper blots, weighing 0.3 g, was effectuated from the said envelop. It is alleged that at the instance of accused Gajender, a recovery of 6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top