Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
FIITJEE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint alleges conspiracy and financial deceit (Para 3) |
| 2. court deliberates on the sufficiency of evidence (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. civil agreements do not preclude criminality claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. dispute status and need for police intervention questioned (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 5. civil nature recognized; clarification on potential criminality (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 30) |
| 6. court emphasizes dual remedy possibility in proceedings (Para 31 , 32) |
| 7. court reaffirms discretion of magistrate in evidence collection (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. court dismisses petition; finds no procedural irregularities (Para 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT :
AMIT MAHAJAN, J.
1. The present petition is filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 14.02.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Revisional Court, in Cr.Rev. 395/2018.
2. By the impugned order, the learned Revisional Court had upheld the order dated 19.05.2018, in CC No. 12114/2017, whereby the learned Trial Court had dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’).
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
3.1. It is the case of the complaint petitioner that Res
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
