SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 1015

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RANJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on false allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by the defense regarding consent. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
3. court's analysis of fir validity and statements. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. decision to quash fir based on contradictions. (Para 25)
5. final order to quash the fir and conclusion. (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

ANISH DAYAL, J.

1. This petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 220/2024 dated 22nd March 2024 under Section 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) registered at PS Mehrauli and proceedings emanating therefrom.

Factual Background

2. The FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint by respondent no.2 that the accused/petitioner used to drive a bus from Rajasthan and come to her house and did a “wrong act with her”, sent an SMS from her phone to his phone and then started threatening her. Later, he came to the house and did a “wrong act with her” and seduced her, took her to the hotel where he clicked her photos and started threatening her that if she does not have a physical relationship, he would make her photos viral.

3. As per the allegations of the prosecutrix, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top