ROBIN PHUKAN
Suresh Garodia S/o Late Gangadhar Garodia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assamq – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. A. K. Bhattacharyya, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1 and Mr. T. H. Hazarika, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2.
2. This application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is preferred by the petitioner, namely Sri Suresh Garodia, for quashing of proceedings of GR Case No.13706/16, under Section 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to Bharalumukh Police Station Case No. 580/16, and also for quashing the order dated 04.07.2017, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guwahati, in GR Case No. 13706/16, for taking cognizance under Section 376/506 of the IPC. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order, dated 04.07.2017, the learned Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner by rejecting the Final Report submitted by the Investigating Officer.
3. The factual background, leading to filing of this criminal petition, is briefly stated as under:-
R. P. Kapur vs. Union of India
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal
Sohan Singh vs. State of Bihar reported in (2000) 1 SCC 68.
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466
State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh
Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
State of W.B. v. Swapan Kumar Guha
Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar, (1985) 2 SCC 370
State of Kerela Versus. O.C. Kuttan reported in (1999) 2 SCC 651
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. vs. Mohd. Sharaful Hoque reported in (2005) 1 SCC 122
Sanapareddy Maheedhar Sesagiri vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2007) 13 SCC 165
State of Orissa vs. Pratima Mohanty, 2021 SCC On Line SC 1222
State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp1 SCC 335 : AIR 1992 SC 604
State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Akhil Sharada & Ors.
Right to protection from sexual harassments is universally recognised basic human rights - Common minimum requirement of right has received global acceptance. This right has been embodied in Articles....
The power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be exercised to prevent the abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. The Court can quash the F.I.R. if the allegations do not constitute an offence o....
Legal proposition in respect of quashing of FIR/Complaint and criminal proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The court emphasized that when a victim alleges rape and states there was no consent, the presumption under Section 114A of the IPC must apply, reinforcing that such matters must be resolved in a ful....
The power of quashing should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances when a prima facie case is not made out against the accused. The court also highlighted the principles that g....
The court emphasized that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly exercised and that the court should not interfere with the investigation unless no cognizable offence is disclosed. I....
The power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in deserving cases. The veracity of the allegations in the FIR should be tested by the investigating agency, and the cou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.