SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 879

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DELHI COMMISSION FOR WOMEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as „CrPC‟) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/Delhi Commission for Women.

2. It is submitted in the Petition that the Petitioner is the Chairperson of Delhi Commission for Women (hereinafter referred to as „DCW‟), a Statutory Body, formed under the Delhi Commission for Women Act, 1994.

3. Briefly stated, the FIR No. 1553/2015 under Section 363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as „IPC‟) and Section 4/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as „POCSO Act‟), was registered at Police Station Burari, by a minor girl, aged 14 years along with her mother, who approached the Respondent No. 2/SHO, Burari wherein allegations were made of a kidnapping and being kept in confinement and subjected to sexual assault. The minor girl was produced before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 05.01.2016 where her Statement under Section 164 CrPC was recorded, in which she stated that she did not blame any person for comm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top