SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Del) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
Master Devarsh, Son of Ms. Sapna Jain – Appellant
Versus 
Union Of India, Through Ministry of Home Affairs (Through its Secretary) – Respondent 
W.P.(CRL) 1092 of 2019, CRL.M.A. 11985 of 2019, CRL.M.A. 36916 of 2019, CRL.M.A. 8514 of 2022, CRL.M.A. 16235 of 2022, CRL.M.A. 4984 of 2023, CRL.M.A. 8835 of 2023, CRL.M.A. 9539 of 2023, CRL.M.A. 35776 of 2024, CRL.M.A. 34561 of 2025
Decided On : 26-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.K Manan, Sr Adv along with Mr. Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Adv, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Uditi Bali, Adv, Mr. K.S Choudhary, Adv, Mr. Lavish, Adv and Ms. Tanya, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. T Singhdev, Mr. Vedant Sood, Advocates Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr. Bhanu Gulati, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Sourabh Kumar, Mr. Vedant Sood, Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Advocates Mr. Praveen Khattar & Mr. Pritam Kumar Adv. Mr. Arjun Dewan and Mr. Jasraj Singh, Chhabra, Advocates Mr. Ripudaman Bharadwaj CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advocates for UOI.

Negligence claims in medical care must be substantiated by competent medical opinions before FIR registration, and fundamental rights to health are protected under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 336 and 337 - Allegations of medical negligence during C-section delivery resulting in hypoxic injury and neurological disorder in newborn - Proper legal action sought against hospital and doctors - Writ Petitions relate to essential remedies for medical negligence in infant care and responsibilities of medical practitioners. (Paras 1, 3, 17)

(B) Right to Life - Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India - Right to live with dignity encompasses right to health care and medical treatment - Ensuring protection from medical negligence is essential for safeguarding fundamental rights of patients. (Paras 17, 18)

Facts of the case:
Master Devarsh, delivered at Fortis Hospital on 12.08.2017, suffered severe asphyxia leading to brain damage. Allegations arise from lack of proper diagnosis and treatment, subsequently causing mental and physical disabilities. (Paras 4, 6)

Findings of Court:
Despite claims of negligence, the Investigating Officer did not find basis for medical negligence, as medical opinions concluded no wrongdoing. The complaints of parents about insufficient care and misrepresentation of the child’s health post-discharge were addressed. (Paras 22, 25, 58)

Issues: Whether the allegations of medical negligence against the hospital and doctors have merit; adequacy of investigations into the matter; and legality of pursuing a complaint through writ petitions when remedies under law are available. (Paras 60)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that while allegations of medical negligence warranted inquiry, the medical reports indicating no negligence weakened the claims. FIR registration was validated based on procedural guidelines; however, ongoing investigative authority cannot be unduly obfuscated. (Paras 21, 26, 58)

Result: Writ Petitions disposed of without further directions, affirming remedies in statutory processes.

Table of Content
1. establishment of medical negligence and injury due to hospital's actions. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 32)
2. arguments regarding negligence and its legal implications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20)
3. supreme court's observations on the necessity of medical opinion in negligence cases. (Para 21 , 22 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. details of ongoing investigations and procedural delays. (Para 30 , 31 , 36 , 39)
5. conclusion regarding fir registration and pursuing legal remedies. (Para 56 , 59 , 60 , 61)

JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The aforesaid two Writ Petitions have been filed in regard to the Petitioner, Master Devarsh having suffered alleged medical negligence and injury of infantile spasm, severe epilepsy, physical disabilities and mental retardation, on account of the alleged negligence of Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh and its Doctors.

2. Writ Petition (Crl.) No.1092/2019 filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Master Devarsh seeks directions for proper investigations and action against the erring Doctors.

3. W.P. (Crl.) 3537/2019 has been filed by the Petitioners, Dr. Ritu Verma, Dr. Akhilesh Singh, Dr. Vivek Jain seeking quashing of the FIR No.0480/2019 dated 01.10.2019 under Section 336 /337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “ IPC ”) P.S. Shalimar Bagh registered against them and is pending investigations.

4. The brief facts are that Master Devarsh was delivered on 12.08.2017 at Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh. At the time of C-Section delivery, the child suffered severe Asphysia (hypoxic injury), leading to complete damage of the brain of the new born child.

5. The child was kept in Neonatal ICU for 11 days and was thereafter, discharged by the Hospital vide Discharge Summary which indicated “Baby has no neurological concern throughout stay”.

6. In the Petition filed on behalf of Master Devarsh, it was asserted that there was absolute lack of coordination and due diligence in handling the delivery of the child by the concerned Doctors and staff of the Hospital, leading to the hypoxic injury about which the parents of the child were kept in complete dark and the child was handed over to them as a fit and normal baby. Immediately after discharge, the parents found the child suffering from some jerks. They took the child to the Consulting Doctor, who advised them to ignore the jerks.

7. It was claimed that from his birth on 12.08.2017 till March, 2018 i.e. for about 8 months, the child was speechless, he kept writhing in unbearable pain in his head, but there was no clue to the parents that he had undergone brain haemorrhage at the time of birth. Eventually, the child started missing the desired milestones and his body started getting more and more stiff.

8. The parents took the child once again to the Doctor, who then finally declared after a lapse of significant time which was crucial for the normal growth of the child, that he is a special needs child and needs to be shown to a Neurological Paediatrician for further treatment.

9. The EEG and MRI of the child was conducted and it was revealed that he was suffering from rare disease called “West Syndrome” caused due to severe damage in the brain. It was then unravelled that the child suffered the Brain Haemorrhage due to asphyxia, at the time of birth. He is dependent upon painful and harsh Occupational Therapies and is surviving on bitter in pungent medicines including steroids.

10. A Criminal Complaint was made to the Police under Section 308 , 325, 338, 193, 201, 406, 420, 471, 120-B, 34 IPC against Fortis Hospital, its Management and the Doctors for causing grave injury to the brain of the child and keeping it concealed from the parents. No action was taken by the Police. Eventually, a Complaint along with an Application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C was filed before the learned M.M. Rohini Courts. However, despite efforts, no fruitful action has been taken.

11. It is further asserted that a Complaint was made to DGHS (Director Genera

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top