Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
TDI International India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the arbitration case and claims involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. overview of arbitration proceedings and awards. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. contentions of the petitioner regarding claims. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 4. contentions of the respondent opposing the petitioner's claims. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 5. court's analysis of the arbitration and claims. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 6. interpreting the contract and the arbitrator's findings. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 7. assessment of electricity disconnection claim. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. examination of the force majeure claim. (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 9. discussion on parallel advertising claim. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 10. conclusion and determination of appeals. (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85) |
| 11. final ruling on claims. (Para 86) |
| 12. order of the court on costs. (Para 87) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration an
Judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited to assessing non-compliance with public policy or blatant errors; arbitral awards will not be disturbed unless they....
Judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited; an award may only be set aside for contravention of public policy or patent illegality, rather than disagreements over contra....
The court affirmed that limited judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not allow for re-evaluation of arbitration awards unless they are demonstrably perverse, illegal, or devoi....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
The limited grounds for interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasize the concept of patent illegality and the criteria for setting asi....
Limited grounds for interference with an Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
