Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
TDI International India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [A&C Act] challenging theArbitral Award dated 26.02.2010 [Impugned Award] rendered by the learned Sole Arbitrator in the matter titled "M/s TDI International India Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.” In addition to assailing the Impugned Award, the Petitioner has, in the present Petition, also sought multiple reliefs in respect of various Claims.
2. It is relevant to note that, during the course of arguments before this Court, the Petitioner confined its challenge primarily to four claims, namely, Claim Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6, as decided by the learned Arbitrator.
BRIEF FACTS:
3. The Petitioner (Claimant in the Arbitral Proceedings) is a company engaged in the business of outdoor, indoor and transit advertising.
4. The Respondent herein (Respondent in the Arbitral Proceedings), invited tenders vide Tender document dated 19.01.2004 for Advertising Rights inside stations and circulating areas located between Kanahiya Nagar - Rithala Section (eight stations), for a period of five (05) years.
5. The Petitioner emerged as the highest bidd
Judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited to assessing non-compliance with public policy or blatant errors; arbitral awards will not be disturbed unless they....
Judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited; an award may only be set aside for contravention of public policy or patent illegality, rather than disagreements over contra....
The court affirmed that limited judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not allow for re-evaluation of arbitration awards unless they are demonstrably perverse, illegal, or devoi....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
The limited grounds for interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasize the concept of patent illegality and the criteria for setting asi....
Limited grounds for interference with an Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
The scope of judicial review of an arbitral award is limited. The Court will not interfere with an arbitral award unless it is patently illegal, in contravention of the fundamental policy of India, o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
