IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
MD Sahid – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT Of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.
1. In this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.P.C.), accused no.2 (A2) in SC No. 44559/2015 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-02 (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, assails the judgment dated 24.02.2018 and order on sentence dated 27.02.2018 as per which he has been convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Sections 308 , 341 and 323 read with Section 34of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC ).
2. The prosecution case is that on 07.03.2014, at about 11:15 A.M., in Gali No. 1, New Mustafabad, Delhi, A1 and A2, wrongfully restrained PW1, and thereafter abused and assaulted him with a hard blunt object/iron rod, and struck him on his head, causing bleeding injuries. Hence, as per the charge-sheet/final report dated 30.05.2015, the accused were alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 323 , 341 and 308 read with Section 34 IPC .
3. On the basis of Exhibit PW1/A FIS of PW1, given on 07.03.2014, Crime no. 264/2014, Gokul Puri Police Station, i.e., Exhibit PW7/B FIR was registered by PW7, the then Assistant Sub Inspector. PW9, Sub Inspector (SI) was entru
The court held that intent and knowledge are crucial in determining culpability under Section 308 IPC, and insufficient evidence of intent or aggravating circumstances necessitates acquittal under th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable and consistent evidence in criminal cases, as well as the need for corroboration in material particulars by reliable t....
Point of law: There may be no difficulty in accepting or discarding the testimony of the single witness. The difficulty arises in the third category of cases. The court has to be circumspect and has ....
A conviction based solely on unreliable witness testimonies, which failed to support the allegations, cannot be sustained in law.
The court upheld the conviction for attempted murder, affirming that injuries sustained by the victim, combined with their reliability as an injured witness, demonstrated intent to kill under Section....
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; significant contradictions in witness testimony can invalidate a case leading to acquittal.
Point of Law : Voluntary Causing hurt and Wrongfully restrained - Conviction Set aside - When considering ingredients to find commission of offence under Section 341 of IPC, wrongful confinement as d....
The prosecution must prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and contradictions in the evidence can raise doubts about the case.
The reliability of injured witnesses' testimony and medical reports can establish guilt despite inconsistencies and lapses in the investigation.
The appellants were convicted for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as the assault occurred without premeditation during a sudden quarrel, with shared common intention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.