IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SHAMEEM AKTHER, N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Rupa M. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J.
This criminal appeal, under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.'), is filed by the appellant/de facto complainant, aggrieved by the judgment, dated 13.12.2012, passed in SC No.22 of 2012 by the Special Judge for trial of offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, whereby, the respondent Nos.3 to 5 herein/A1 to A3 were found not guilty of the offences under Sections 323 and 307 read with 34 of IPC and were acquitted under Section 235(1) of Cr.P.C.
2. We have heard the submissions of Mr. Prabhakar Sripada, learned Counsel for the appellant/de facto complainant, Sri C. Pratap Reddy, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State, Mr. M.S. Rao, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.3 to 5/A1 to A3 and perused the record.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows :
On 21.12.2010 at about 01:30 hours, PW1-M. Rupa went to Gandhinagar Police Station and lodged Ex.P1 complaint stating that A1 to A3 were residing at Flat No.204, Pushpavathy Residency, New Bhoiguda, are her tenants. They are due by Rs.42,000/- to her mother towards rents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.