Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SHAMEEM AKTHER, N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Rupa M. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case background and filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments of appellant and respondents regarding credibility. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. discussion on witness credibility and evidence reliability. (Para 14 , 20 , 23) |
| 4. legal principles regarding witness reliability and evidence assessment. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final judgment dismissing the appeal. (Para 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT :
Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J.
This criminal appeal, under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.'), is filed by the appellant/de facto complainant, aggrieved by the judgment, dated 13.12.2012, passed in SC No.22 of 2012 by the Special Judge for trial of offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, whereby, the respondent Nos.3 to 5 herein/A1 to A3 were found not guilty of the offences under Sections 323 and 307 read with 34 of IPC and were acquitted under Section 235(1) of Cr.P.C.
2. We have heard the submissions of Mr. Prabhakar Sripada, learned Counsel for the appellant/de facto complainant, Sri C. Pratap Reddy, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State, Mr. M.S. Rao, learned C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
