SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Del) 277

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.
 
Hero Electric Vehicles Private Limited & Anr. - Plaintiffs 
Versus 
Mr. Nitish Kumar & Ors. – Defendants
CS(COMM) 104 of 2022
Decided On : 04-02-2026
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiffs : Ms. Pragya Mishra, Adv.

Trademarks and copyrights are protectable against unauthorized use, and courts can grant permanent injunctions and punitive damages in cases of fraud and deception.

Headnote:(A) Trademarks Act, 1999; Copyright Act, 1957 - Infringement and Unauthorized Use - Permanent injunction granted against defendants for the unauthorized use of plaintiff's registered trademarks HERO ELECTRIC and related copyrights related to providing deceptive dealership offers for electric vehicles - Defendants proceeded ex-parte; court found statutory and common law rights strongly favor plaintiff; irreparable injury due to fraud and deception established. (Paras 1, 19, 30, 33)

(B) Damages - Plaintiff entitled to exemplary and punitive damages for the defendants' fraudulent activities causing significant public impact; Rs.20,00,000/- awarded as damages and Rs.3,00,000/- as litigation costs. (Paras 31, 33)

Facts of the case:
Plaintiffs, engaged in the electric vehicle business, filed a suit against defendants for tortious interference through unauthorized use of their trademarks and defrauding of customers.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the defendants' actions could cause severe damage to plaintiffs' goodwill and reputation, necessitating protective legal action.

Issues: The main issue was whether the plaintiffs had successfully established their rights over the trademarks and whether the defendants had infringed upon those rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed that adequate protection of trademarks is paramount, especially in cases involving fraudulent conduct aimed at the public, justifying the grant of a permanent injunction along with significant damages.

Result: Suit decreed in favor of the plaintiffs.

Table of Content
1. trademark ownership and usage rights (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. protection of trademarks from unauthorized use (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. procedural compliance and service of defendants (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. procedural rulings in absence of defendants (Para 18 , 19)
5. compliance by third parties and implications (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. fraud and deception in trademark infringement (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. admission of documents and facts in ex-parte cases (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
8. imposition of damages and punitive measures (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
9. final decree and disposal of the suit (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT :

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.

1. The present suit has been filed seeking, inter alia, a decree of permanent injunction against the defendant nos.1 and 2, to prevent the dishonest adoption and subsequent unauthorized use of its trademarks and copyrights in relation to offering services and, inter alia, soliciting dealership enquiries with respect to sale and exhibition of electric vehicles bearing

trademark, through the domain name, www.evbikedealership.online and the e-mail ID contact@evbikedelearship.online, being registered with the defendant no.3/GoDaddy.com, LLC (DNR), as well as damages and costs.

2. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the plaintiff no.1/Hero Electric Vehicles Private Limited is in the business of electric vehicles and related infrastructure development. The plaintiff no.2 is a partnership firm established on 01.05.2010 and is the trademark holding entity of the plaintiff group of companies, which includes entities such as Hero Electric Vehicles Private Limited (plaintiff no.1).

3. The plaintiff no.2, in order to obtain statutory protection over its brand and trademark HERO ELECTRIC, in the year 2008, when it was a part of the wider Munjal Group, applied for the registration of the trademark/device mark HERO ELECTRIC and its variants, the essential part/feature thereto being “Hero”/“Hero Electric”, under Class 12. The said trademarks are validly registered with effect from the year 2008, the details of which are as follows:-

4. It is stated that the plaintiff no.2, being the registered proprietor of the trademarks HERO/HERO ELECTRIC and its variants, has licensed the same to plaintiff no.1 for use with respect to electric vehicles and to take infringement actions against third parties, if required.

5. The plaintiffs own various HERO formative domains and maintain various HERO formative website(s) including but not limited to www.heroecogroup.com, www.heroecogroup.net, www.hero.in and https://www.heroelectric.in/ (registered in the name of the plaintiff group on 30.12.2006). It is further stated that goods of the plaintiff no.1 in India are also sold through other e-commerce websites and e-stores including but not limited to www.amazon.in, www.zigwheels.com, www.bikedekho.com/hero- electric-scooters and other e-commerce websites and online marketplace(s) all over India.

6. The plaintiffs, in the course of their business, have also created and developed several unique and distinctive logos, representations wherein the trademark HERO ELECTRIC has been depicted in an artistic style and each of such logo/representation are original artistic works within the meaning of Section 2 (c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the copyrights in the said works belong to the plaintiffs. Moreover, copyright in the literary material, brochures, pamphlets, printed material, as well as the web-dress and source code of the plaintiffs’ website, www.heroelectric.in (including the user interface therein) also belong to the plaintiffs.

7. It is further stated that the said trademarks HERO/HERO ELECTRIC have acquired distinctiveness through continued, extensive, and uninterrupted use thereof by the plaintiffs. Since its adoption, the plaintiffs have used the trademarks openly, continuously, and uninterruptedly till date. The plaintiffs have over the years done extensive business and carried out voluminous

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top