SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Del) 295

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANISH DAYAL
United India Insurace Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dhiraj Trahan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Brijesh Kumar Sharma

JUDGMENT :

ANISH DAYAL, J.

1. These appeals have been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’) by the Insurance Company challenging impugned award dated 08th October 2025 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [hereinafter ‘Tribunal ’], North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in MACT Case No. 449556/2016 titled as Dhiraj Trehan v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr .and in MACT Case No. 450066/2016 titled as Geeta Trehan v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr .

2. Appellant/United India Insurance Company (‘Insurance Company’) has preferred this challenge essentially on the grounds that both Dhiraj Trehan and Geeta Trehan (hereinafter, “claimants”) who were occupants of the car driven by Kamal Trehan, father of Dhiraj Trehan and husband of Geeta Trehan.

3. The only contention raised by Insurance Company was that compensation could not be awarded to claimants, since after the death Kamal Trehan/driver and owner of the vehicle, claimants being legal heirs of the deceased became co-owners of the vehicle and stepped into the shoes of Kamal Trehan, who was the insured.

The Accident

4. On 05th October 2013, at about 05:40 A.M., Geeta Trehan, wife of late Kamla Trehan and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top