N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
A – Appellant
Versus
B – Respondent
Mr. N.K. Bhattacharyya, J.—Heard the submission of the learned Senior Advocate Mr. Bhaskar Bhattacharjee appearing with learned Advocate Mr. P. Sinha and the learned Advocate for the opposite parties Mr. S.S. Mukherjee appearing with the learned Advocate Mr. Debasis Das. Mr. Mukherjee at this stage undertakes to file his power in course of this day. Let it be recorded. Considered the materials on record.
2. By the instant application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, O.P. No. 2 before the State Commission has come up before this Court challenging the order dated 8.6.95 (not filed) whereby the said State Commission directed issuance of notice or summons upon the O.Ps. in that proceeding wherein O.P. No. 2 figured as one of the opposite parties. The relevant necessary facts on which this revisional application arises is that Smt. Soma Roy widow of late Tarit Kumar Roy, as a complainant filed an application for compensation for deficiency of medical service u/Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, before the West Bengal State Commission Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhabani Bhavan, Calcutta, on 8.6.95 and the same was registered there as State Commission C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.