SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.N.CHATURVEDI, V.N.MISHRA
DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELEPHONES – Appellant
Versus
RAMA KANT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. Amarnath Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mr. V.N. Mishra, Member—The present appeal is directed against the order dated 23.8.1994 passed by the District Forum, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1/94.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant's telephone No. 22262 is defective. It frequently gets cross-connected with other telephones resulting in false metering causing inflated bills. This defect has been persisting since several years and it has not been rectified by the opposite parties inspite of several complaints made by the complainant.

3. The complainant had filed a Complaint Case No. 63/91 before the District Forum, Gaya. It was mutually agreed between the complainant and the opposite parties during the pendency of the complaint case that average bills will be furnished by the opposite parties to the complainant and excess amount paid by the complainant, if any, will be adjusted in future bills. The District Forum passed consent order and directed the opposite parties for its compliance. The average bills for the six bi- monthly bills for the first year of the disputed bills for three years worked out to Rs. 409/-. But the opposite parties had realised Rs. 13,215/- from the complainant for bills starting
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top