SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SHASHI KANTA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Ram Raj, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice K.C. Bhargava, President— This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 18.5.1994 passed by District Consumer Forum, Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No. 957/ 1993.

2. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the complainant applied for a plot in Govindpuram Housing Scheme and deposited the reservation amount. On the basis of this application, a plot was reserved for the complainant and the complainant in compliance of the payment of schedule deposited the entire amount with the Ghaziabad Development Authority. The complainant requested several times the Ghaziabad Development Authority for possession of the plot but nothing has been done by the Ghaziabad Development Authority and hence the complainant prayed for refund of the amount deposited along with 18% per annum interest.

3. The opposite party in its written version has alleged that due to certain unavoidable circumstances the possession of the plot could not be delivered. If the complainant wants to get the refund of the amount, then the same can be done with 5% per annum interest as per the rules.

4. The learned District Forum after considering the case of the parties directed for refund of the amount























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top