SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.D.SHAHI, SURENDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NAZIR AHMAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Avi Nanda, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. V.K. Vashist, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice K.D. Shahi, Chairman—This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 15th May, 1995 passed by the District Forum, Pithoragarh allowing a claim of Rs. 84,000/- along with interest and compensation of Rs. 5,000/- in favour of the complainant.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant was the owner of mini truck canter 1988 model, No. UP 03/0322. It was insured. During the insurance period on 9.5.1991, it met with an accident. The claimant lodged the claim with the Insurance Company. The Surveyor assessed the loss of Rs. 84,000/-. The claim was repudiated by the Insurance Company. The claimant filed a complaint. The Insurance Company, inter alia, contested on the ground that the vehicle was a medium goods vehicle where the driver of the vehicle had a licence for driving a light motor vehicle. The vehicle was, therefore, being driven by a person who had no valid licence to drive the vehicle at the time of accident. This is the only point which was agitated in this appeal.

3. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and gone through the records. It is admitted fact that the vehicle is a mini truck canter 1988 model. Insurance is also admitte























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top