Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted his arguments on the strength of Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 stating that there are more numbers of persons than one and without obtaining permission, a complaint cannot be entertained. He has also submitted that only booking was done and that there was no consideration for the same. The objection under Section 12(1)(c) relating to jurisdiction ought to have been specifically raised in the Revision Petition as one of the grounds. The learned Counsel for the petitioner requires that he may be permitted to raise it as an additional ground before the Lower Forum and that his party may also be permitted to adduce evidence on that aspect and other aspects as well before the lower Forum.

2. The Counsel for the respondent submitted that this Commission in a case reported in III (1994) CPJ 29, where a complaint was filed in respect of 12 consignments and clubbed in a complaint has held that the Consumer Protection Act has provided for a simple procedure and has done away with such legal technicalities and, therefore, a single complaint can be filed relating to 12 consignments and he