SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.K.TAIMNI, P.D.SHENOY
Jawant Rai Thaper – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Improvement Trust Ludhiana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellant :Shri Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shri P.N. Puri, Advocate.

ORDER

Dr. P.D. Shenoy, Member — This is a classic case wherein the complainant had filed a civil case against the Improvement Trust, Ludhiana and got a decree in his favour and instead of executing the same he has filed a complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab which held that ‘delay in compliance of decree passed by the Civil Court cannot be a consumer dispute that any relief can be granted to the complainant in this case. After decree of the Civil Suit finally, if there was some delay in getting it executed, it will not be a case of deficiency in rendering service on the part of the opposite party. After adjudication of the dispute by the Civil Court, it no longer remains a consumer dispute to be considered under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. The complaint has to be dismissed leaving the complainant to approach the Civil Court for the relief, if so advised. The question is answered accordingly.

For the reasons recorded above, finding no merit in the complaint, the same is dismissed leaving the complainant to approach the Civil Court, if so advised for the relief.’

2. Dissatisfied with the order of the State Commission he has filed t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top