SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JASBIR SINGH, DEV RAJ, PADMA PANDEY
Amit Goel – Appellant
Versus
Puma Realtors Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Sh. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate
For the Opp.Party:Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dev Raj, Member—The facts, in brief, are that the complainant was willing to own a residential plot for his family and personal use. As such, he alongwith his friend, Shri Manoj Goyal jointly applied for a plot in the project of the Opposite Party, namely ‘IREO Hamlet’ in Sector 98, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali on 20.02.2011. Plot No.62 measuring 273.79 sq. yards was allotted on 29.04.2011 vide allotment letter (Annexure C-2). The complainant paid an amount of Rs.6,50,000/- and Rs.2,94,576/- on 21.02.2011 and 28.07.2011 respectively. A Plot Buyer’s Agreement was executed between the parties on 24.08.2011 at Chandigarh. After execution of the Agreement, the complainant paid an amount of Rs.10,31,853/- each on 03.01.2012 and 20.03.2014 respectively. The friend of the complainant transferred his share to the complainant on 15.02.2014 vide Agreement to Sell (Annexure C-1). As per Clause 11 of the Agreement, Possession of the plot, in question, was to be delivered within a period of 24 months plus grace period of 6 months plus additional 12 months extended grace period, i.e. 42 m














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top