SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.APPA RAO, M.SHREESHA, G.BHOOPATHI REDDY
MOHD. AZAM – Appellant
Versus
BIRLA SUNLIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S. Malla Rao, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Singam Srinivasa Rao, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

D. Appa Rao, President (Oral)- The complainants are nominees and assignees of the policy holder, late Mohd. Mohtesham Azmi. Their case in brief is that late Mohd. Mohtesham Azmi a business man had taken various policies from the opposite parties/insurance companies after completing the formalities. As per the directions of the insurance companies premia were paid. They were accepted by the insurance companies, and policies were issued. Various details of the policies and nominees/assignees as the case may be are mentioned herein along with its case No.

C.D. No. 69/2003

1. Name of Insurance Company

Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

2. Policy No.

27787

3. Date of Policy

8.8.2002

4. Sum assured

Rs. 70,48,758.68

5. Premium

Rs. 2,98,900 (Quarterly)

6. Nominee/LR/ Assignee

Mohd. Azam (Father)

7. Claim

Rs. 70,48,758.68

C.D No. 70/2003

1. Name of Insurance

Om Kotak Mahindra Life Company Insurance Co. Ltd.

2. Policy No.

13207

3. Date of Policy

1.4.2002

4. Sum assured

Rs. 75 lakh

5. Nominee/LR/ Assignee

Mohd. Azam (Father

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top