SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. A.K. Thakur, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, Advocate

ORDER

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. A.K. Thakur, counsel for the complainant and Mr. Yogesh Malhotra, counsel for the opposite parties.

2. Suzuki Powertrain India Limited (now merged with Maruti Suzuki India Limited) (the complainant) (hereinafter referred to as the Insured) filed the present complaint, for directing National Insurance Company Limited and others (the Insurer) to pay to the Insured (i) the claim of Rs.25,83,33,948/- under the Insurance Policy, (ii) interest @ 18% per annum from June, 2008 till actual date of payment, (iii) Rs. 50 lakhs as the compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iv) Rs. 50 lakhs as the damages for loss of business and (v) such other or further order as this Commission may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case.

3. The facts as stated in the complaint are as follows:-

(a) Suzuki Powertrain India Limited was a public limited company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The Insured placed various purchase orders to the vendors in Japan, for purchasing capital equipment (machinery) and accessories

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top