SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL, SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA
Jagadish Ch. Bag – Appellant
Versus
Uttam Kr. Halder – Respondent


ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—This appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 hereinafter (referred to as “the Act”) against the order dated 16/06/2020 passed by the District Consumer Redressal Commission, South 24 Parganas in Complaint Case No. CC – 129/2018.

2. In a nutshell, the complainant’s case in short is that one Uttam Kumar Halder entered into an agreement with the Appellant No. 1 for purchase of a flat dated 28/09/2018 on certain terms and conditions and Appellant No. 1 executed a deed of sale in favour of the said Uttam Kumar Halder, Respondent / Complainant on 04/10/2018. The Appellant No. 1 received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakh only) in total from the complainant / respondent on different dates and Appellant No. 1 also executed receipt on 04/10/2018. In spite of the registration of the flat in favour of the Respondent / Complainant, the Appellant No. 1 and other Appellant No. 2 to 4 did not hand over the flat to the respondent for a considerable time and the respondent was compelled to file a number of cases against the Appellants for getting physical possession of the disputed property. As such, the Respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top