R. Singh VS Shabana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, RAJAN SHARMA
R. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shabana – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Pankaj Chauhan, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Sh. Zareef Ahmad Hasmi, Advocate
For the Insurance Company:Sh. R. K Tripathi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President—The facts of the case as per the District Forum record are:—

“As per complaint complainant went to OP1 hospital where she got treated by OP2. As per advice of OP 2 after regular checkups and medicines she was admitted in OP1 hospital on 20.02.2012. On 21.2.2012 at about 12:00 hours she gave birth to a child, through operation. Thereafter at about 2:30 PM one staff nurse, namely Menaz, gave metro 100 injection to her, intramuscular and not intravenous. After some time complainant’s hand started getting swelling and innumerable pain. On complaint various medicines were given, by OPs to her, but with no result. Rather condition of the hand kept on deteriorating day by day, inspite of OPs’ false assurances to cure the same, on one pretext or the other. Finding no way out complainant had to visit another doctor to whom she could not produce treatment records, as OPs didn’t provide the same to her, despite approaching them several times, on the false excuse that the documents being with senior doctor, on leave, report could not be prepared. Notice dated 01.10.2012 to OP2 for requiring the same was also not responded to by OP2. Even police compl