Back
S. P. TAVADE, S. T. BARNE
Saukhyam Construction – Appellant
Versus
Saabir Shakeel Mazgaonkar – Respondent
ORDER
S.T. Barne, Judicial Member—The applicant M/s. Saukhyam Construction through its partners has filed this application for transfer of consumer case no.10/19 and 11/19 pending on the file of District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Ratnagiri to the file of District Dispute Redressal Commission Kolhapur. As similar question is involved in both the matters, they are decided by common order.
2. It is the contention of applicants that they are opponents in original complaint and the present respondent Shabbir Sahil Majgaonkar is the original complainant. Said complainant has filed consumer complaint before District Commission Ratnagiri praying for directions and order from the District Commission directing these applicants to hand over the gala in question, together with aminities and facilities as per agreement dated 11/01/2016. The complainant has also claimed Rs.9,00,000/- towards loss incurred in business and Rs.2,00,000/- towards mental agony and harassment. It is the contention of the applicants that the respondent has suppressed the material fact before the District Commission that the respondent has purchased gala from erstwhile Owner by agreement dated 18/10/1996, wh
Transfer Application –The District Commission is supposed to decide the complaints summarily and preferably within three months.
Consumer Protection Act itself is enacted to protect the interest of consumers and for the same purpose, to establish authorities for timely and effective administration and settlement of consumers' ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
