SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Royal Build Square Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kaushalya Memani – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Rakesh K. Rajwania, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Charu Mathur, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

Final arguments heard on behalf of both the parties.

2. Vide this appeal, the appellants, who were the opposite parties before the State Commission, have challenged the order dated 06.12.2017 of the State Commission in C.C. No. 17 of 2014.

3. The brief admitted facts of the case are that the respondent, hereinafter be referred as complainant, had booked a flat in the project “Unique Green Acres” of the appellants in Jodhpur. On the basis of the map and documents of the project shown to the complainant, the complainant agreed to buy a flat on 12th Floor of the said project. The consideration amount of the flat was Rs.27,64,500/-. Out of this sum, on various dates, the complainant had paid a sum total of Rs.6,91,459/. Various receipts towards this payment had also been issued by the appellants. Flat No. F-1207 at the 12th Floor was allotted to the complainant. In the month of January, 2014, the complainant learnt that the appellant did not have approval to construct the 12th Floor of the project “Unique Green Acres” and that the appellants had mislead her into this project and thereby adopted unfair trade practices and had committed an act of cheating. Also there was no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top