SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Akshay Gupta – Appellant
Versus
ICICI Bank Limited through its Managing Diretor & CEO – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Shilpa Gamnani, Advocate
For the Opp. Party No.1:Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocate, Mr. Kartik Bhalla, Advocate
For the Opp. Party Nos.2 and 3:Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Ms. Shilpa Gamnani, Advocate and other advocates in all the above complaints, for the complainants, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocate, for opposite party-1 and Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar, Advocate, for opposite parties-2 and 3.

2. In above complaints, same issues of facts and law have been raised against same opposite parties as such all the complaints are decided by a common judgment. For appreciating the controversy, facts of CC/63/2020 are mentioned. Relevant facts in above complaints are given in the chart below:—

CC No.

Name of the Complainant

Flat No.

Date of  sanction  of Loan

Date of  Disbursement

Amount of  Loan

CC/63/2020

Akshay Gupta  & Garima Mishra

Flat No.410, B-Wing,  4th floor, Raj Infinia,

21.08.2013

30.08.2013

Rs.12334541/-

CC/64/2020

Nagraj Mahadev  Shetti

Flat No.1008, 10th floor, B-Wing Raj Infinia,

19.07.2013

24.07.2013

Rs.12799364/-

CC/172/2020

Pritam Kumar  Patnaik & Bandita  Panda

Flat No.414, 4th floor,  C-Wing Raj Infinia,

07.08.2013

31.07.2013

Rs.17862159/-

CC/174/2020

M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top