SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA
Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Sales Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jitender Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This review petition filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the Haryana State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Panchkula, Haryana (in short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 300 of 2015 and Appeal No. 130 of 2015 which were disposed of by way of a common order dated 02.11.2015 setting aside the order of the District Forum, Hisar (in short, ‘District Forum’) dated 08.01.2015 in Complaint No.407 of 2011.

2. The revision petitioner/complainant has alleged that he was sold substandard cement by the respondent for which compensation is sought. It is averred that he had purchased 100 bags of cement manufactured by respondent no. 2 from respondent no. 1 who is a dealer for Shree Cement Ltd. for the flooring of his house. He engaged a local mason and undertook the work with proportionate mixing which was left to cure for 15 to 20 days. However, the cement did not set properly and was attributed by the mason to the poor quality of the cement. As there was no redress provided by the respondents, the petitioner approached the District Forum, Hisar by way of Consumer Complaint N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top