R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
Anurag Sachdeva – Appellant
Versus
S. Sivakamy – Respondent
ORDER
R.K. Agrawal, President—The challenge in the Revision Petition No. 3204 of 2017 preferred by Opposite Party No. 3, viz., Anurag Sachdeva and Revision Petition Nos. 3276 and 3277 of 2017 filed by the Complainant under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short ‘the Act’), is to the Orders dated 14.07.2017 in Appeal No. 1343/2014 and Appeal No. 1488/2014 passed by the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission) whereby the State Commission has concurred with the finding of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as ‘District Forum’) holding deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties but reduced the compensation the compensation of Rs.14,00,000/- as awarded by the District Forum to Rs.8,00,000/-.
2. Since all the three Revision Petitions are arising out of one Complaint, they are being disposed of by this common Order.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Complainant’s daughter was student of Class IV B of Opposite Party No. 2 School where Opposite Party No. 1 was the Principal. Opposite Party No. 3 was carrying on repa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.