SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C. VISWANATH, SUBHASH CHANDRA
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Jatinder Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition, under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Petitioner against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.1076/2013 dated 24.10.2013.

2. Briefly put, facts of the case are that the Complainant/Petitioner, proprietor of M/s Sherry Knitwears was sanctioned advance Credit Limit of Rs.2,00,000/- by the Petitioner/Opposite Party Bank at Link Road Branch, Ludhiana, vide CC A/c No. 1014712823, against security by way of equitable mortgage on the property of the Respondent, namely land measuring 100 Sq. Yds. situated at Khasra No. 2258/1837/858, Khata No. 2237/2679 situated at Guru Nanak Pura, Civil Lines, Ludhiana. Opposite Party also took the original sale deed of the said property from the Complainant. The Complainant requested for return of his above said original sale deed, after clearing all the dues to the Opposite Party, to which the Opposite Party replied that the same is not traceable and they will return the same within few days. Despite repeated visits made by the Complainant, the Opposite Party delay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top