SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A. K. TIWARI, SRIKANT PANDEY
Satya Prakash Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shri Infrastructure Finance Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Shri Hemant Sharma, learned counsel
For the Respondents: None

ORDER

The following order of the Commission was delivered by A.K. Tiwari, Presiding Member:

This is an appeal by the complainant/appellant against the order dated 19.04.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gwalior (for short ‘District Commission) in C.C.No.778/2010 whereby the complaint filed by him has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case as stated by the complainant in his complaint are that he approached the opposite party no.3 at Gwalior for taking finance and had completed all the formalities. It is submitted that he had deposited 37 cheques and two registry of immovable property then the opposite party no.1 financed an amount of Rs.17,58,000/- and he had purchased a vehicle UP-93 E-8314. It is submitted that he paid Rs.17,18,000/- through instalments and on 23.10.2008 by depositing last instalment he demanded three cheques, two registry of immovable property and no dues certificate then it is informed that Rs.25,000/- are remaining then he paid Rs.25,000/- despite that the opposite parties did not provide him no dues certificate. He therefore filed a complaint before the District Commission alleging deficiency in service on part of opp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top