Bhawarlal Solonki VS Manager, Bajaj Finance

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUNITA YADAV, MONIKA MALIK
Bhawarlal Solonki – Appellant
Versus
Manager, Bajaj Finance – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Shri Mukesh Shrivastava, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent No.1: Shri Sunil Pandey, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent No.2: None

ORDER :

Sunita Yadav, President.—The appellant/complainant has filed this appeal against the order dated 30.12.2019 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal-1 (for short ‘District Commission’) in C.C.No.129/2015 whereby complaint filed by him has been dismissed.

2. In short, the facts of the case are that the complainant/appellant had obtained loan facility from the Opposite Party No.1-finance company to purchase a motorcycle for which he had given 35 cheques of Bank of Maharashtra, the Opposite Party No.2 to the Opposite Party No.1 towards repayment of loan @ Rs.1445/- monthly installment. It is alleged by the complainant that the Opposite Party No.1-finance company send the cheques for two months in one month i.e. on 08.11.2013 and 09.11.2013 for clearance in the complainant’s bank account with the Opposite Party No.2-bank. The Opposite Party No.2-bank cleared those cheques and total amount of Rs.2,890/- was credited in the bank account of the Opposite Party No.1-finance company. It is alleged by the complainant that instead of one month’s installment, the employees of the Opposite Party No.1-finance company illegally recovered two monthly installments

Click Here to Read the rest of this document