SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. P. PATEL, ARCHANA RAVAL
Punit Keshavbhai Godhaniya – Appellant
Versus
Bharti Axa General Ins. Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. A.S. Bhavsar, Ld. Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Darshil Parikh, Ld. Advocate

ORDER

V.P. Patel, President—The appellant (Original Complainant) has filed this appeal under section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ( for short CP act, 2019), being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 06.04.2022 passed by the Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Junagadh (for short “Learned District Commission”) in Execution Application No. 1 of 2021.

2. Heard ld. advocate Mr. A.S.Bhavsar for the appellant and Ld. Advocate Mr. Darshil Parikh for the Respondent. Perused the record of the case.

3. Order Under Challenge: Ld. District Commission has dispose of Execution Application No. 1/2021 as fully satisfied on 16.04.2022. In this case we have referred the parties as per their original status.

Facts of the Case:

4. That the Appellant (Original Complainant) had filed Consumer Complaint No. 17/2015 before the District Commission Porbandar to recover Rs. 5,82,214/- (Five Lac Eighty Two Thousand Two Hundred Fourteen Only) with 18% interest and Litigation costs and Compensation, Mental harassment etc. The Consumer Complaint No. 17/2015 was partly allowed by the Ld. District Commission vide order dt. 23.05.2017 and directed the Opponent to pay Rs. 5,82,214/- with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top