S. M. KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Chief Medical Officer, Ispat Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Peter Anand Kumar Ekka – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S. M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—The instant appeal is a challenge against the impugned Order dated 25.06.2012 passed by Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ranchi (for short ‘the State Commission’) in CC No. 13 of 2003 whereby the State Commission held the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 to 5 (Appellants herein) liable for medical negligence. The State Commission dismissed the complaint against the Apollo Hospital, the OP No. 6 (Respondent No. 4 herein).
2. Brief facts that, on 02.07.2001 the Complainant’s wife Smt. Sudha Ekka, aged 45 years (since deceased hereinafter referred to be the ‘patient’) was operated by Dr. P.K. Agrawal for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (removal of gall bladder)in the ISPAT Hospital (OP-1). During hospital stay on 09.07.2001, the bile discharge found to be abnormally high. Therefore on the next day she was referred to Andur Razzaque Ansari Memorial Weavers’ Hospital (OP-6), (for short ‘Apollo Hospital’). There ERCP was performed but it remained incomplete as the doctor was unable to cannulate the Common Bile Duct (CBD). Finally,
Dr. Laxman Balakrishna Joshi vs. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole and Anr.
Kusum Sharma and Ors. vs. Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre and Ors.
Bile - The doctors/staff on duty at Apollo Hospital failed to insert drainage tube, which could have accumulated the bile.
In medical negligence, res ipsa loquitur applies to unexplained post-surgical perforations shifting burden to prove non-negligence; doctor's death abates personal liability against heirs; hospital vi....
(1) Pancreatitis – Pancreatitis could be detected only much later but OPs cannot be held responsible.(2) Negligence – The patient’s treatment was based on from OP No.3, which further underscores negl....
(1) Medical negligence – In proceedings arising out of claim for compensation on the basis of medical negligence, opinion and findings of MCI regarding professional conduct of Doctor have great relev....
Known surgical complications like bowel injury during hysterectomy by qualified doctors do not constitute negligence if due care exercised; Medical Council findings post-remand hold great relevance a....
Medical professionals must adhere to established standards of care and obtain informed consent; failure to do so constitutes negligence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.